Coverage varies by state, trade and authority. These are source snapshots, not a census of unique businesses or a live license check. Ratios cannot establish market saturation or contractor quality.
Ohio vs Utah: contractor markets, side by side
Ohio has 12,552 roster records across the trades we cover; Utah has 4,281. Counts come from the Ohio Construction Industry Licensing Board (OCILB) and the Utah DOPL Construction Business Registry; market figures are U.S. Census aggregates.
| Ohio | Utah | |
|---|---|---|
| Covered roster records | 12,552 | 4,281 |
| Snapshot records per 10k residents | 10.7 | 13.0 |
| Residents | 11,774,683 | 3,282,203 |
| Households | 5,251,186 | 1,160,621 |
| ZIP-weighted income indicator | $71,229 | $90,304 |
| Housing units authorized (source year) | 33,640 (2025) | 26,775 (2025) |
| Top covered city by records | Cincinnati | Salt Lake City |
Utah has the higher snapshot ratio: 13.0 source records per 10k residents against 10.7 in Ohio. Differences in source coverage affect this ratio; it does not measure contractors per square mile or competition for jobs.
The ZIP-weighted income indicator is higher in Utah: $90,304 against $71,229 in Ohio, using the Census estimates in this dataset. This indicator does not establish renovation budgets or likely sales.
Trade by trade
| Trade | Ohio | Utah |
|---|---|---|
| Electricians | 4,555 | 251 |
| Plumbers | 3,105 | 214 |
| HVAC Contractors | 4,988 | 440 |
| General Contractors | — | 2,708 |
| Roofing Contractors | — | 142 |
| Solar Contractors | — | 24 |
| Carpenters | — | 584 |
| Concrete Contractors | — | 362 |
| Masons | — | 392 |
| Drywall Contractors | — | 457 |
| Tile Contractors | — | 392 |
| Excavating Contractors | — | 236 |
| Painters | — | 457 |
| Flooring Contractors | — | 584 |
Counts reflect the separate covered-trade snapshot. A “—” means no count is provided here; it says nothing about whether the trade exists or requires a license. These category counts are not reconciled with the headline roster totals.
Figures use separately generated snapshots: overall roster totals, trade counts and mapped-city counts can differ in scope and collection time and should not be added together or treated as a reconciled census. The displayed source refresh date does not date every aggregate. Population and households are sums of the covered ZIP estimates. The income indicator is a population-weighted average of ZIP-level household-income medians, not the state's household median. Census context can refer to a different period from the roster. Housing-unit authorizations refer to the displayed permit year; they are not completed projects. See the ACS estimate guidance and Building Permits Survey for the underlying statistical definitions.
Working one of these markets?
Ohio vs Utah: common questions
Does Ohio or Utah have more contractor records?
Ohio has 12,552 covered records; Utah has 4,281. These counts reflect different source coverage, not a census of operating businesses. Sources: Ohio Construction Industry Licensing Board (OCILB) and the Utah DOPL Construction Business Registry.
Which has the higher snapshot records-to-population ratio, Ohio or Utah?
Utah has the higher snapshot ratio: 13.0 snapshot records per 10k residents against 10.7 in Ohio.
Which has the higher ZIP-weighted income indicator, Ohio or Utah?
Utah: $90,304 against $71,229 in Ohio. This is a population-weighted average of ZIP-level income medians, not either state's household median.
Where does this Ohio vs Utah comparison data come from?
Roster counts derive from Ohio Construction Industry Licensing Board (OCILB) and Utah DOPL Construction Business Registry; population, household, income, and permit figures are U.S. Census aggregates. Counts are snapshot records, not a census of unique companies. Source scope and dates differ between states.