Coverage varies by state, trade and authority. These are source snapshots, not a census of unique businesses or a live license check. Ratios cannot establish market saturation or contractor quality.
Oregon vs Utah: contractor markets, side by side
Oregon has 32,286 roster records across the trades we cover; Utah has 4,281. Counts come from the Oregon CCB + Building Codes Division (BCD) and the Utah DOPL Construction Business Registry; market figures are U.S. Census aggregates.
| Oregon | Utah | |
|---|---|---|
| Covered roster records | 32,286 | 4,281 |
| Snapshot records per 10k residents | 76.3 | 13.0 |
| Residents | 4,229,341 | 3,282,203 |
| Households | 1,818,529 | 1,160,621 |
| ZIP-weighted income indicator | $80,169 | $90,304 |
| Housing units authorized (source year) | 14,679 (2025) | 26,775 (2025) |
| Top covered city by records | Portland | Salt Lake City |
Oregon has the higher snapshot ratio: 76.3 source records per 10k residents against 13.0 in Utah. Differences in source coverage affect this ratio; it does not measure contractors per square mile or competition for jobs.
The ZIP-weighted income indicator is higher in Utah: $90,304 against $80,169 in Oregon, using the Census estimates in this dataset. This indicator does not establish renovation budgets or likely sales.
Trade by trade
| Trade | Oregon | Utah |
|---|---|---|
| Electricians | 1,191 | 251 |
| Plumbers | 1,933 | 214 |
| HVAC Contractors | 458 | 440 |
| General Contractors | 30,673 | 2,708 |
| Roofing Contractors | — | 142 |
| Solar Contractors | — | 24 |
| Carpenters | — | 584 |
| Concrete Contractors | — | 362 |
| Masons | — | 392 |
| Drywall Contractors | — | 457 |
| Tile Contractors | — | 392 |
| Excavating Contractors | — | 236 |
| Painters | — | 457 |
| Flooring Contractors | — | 584 |
Counts reflect the separate covered-trade snapshot. A “—” means no count is provided here; it says nothing about whether the trade exists or requires a license. These category counts are not reconciled with the headline roster totals.
Figures use separately generated snapshots: overall roster totals, trade counts and mapped-city counts can differ in scope and collection time and should not be added together or treated as a reconciled census. The displayed source refresh date does not date every aggregate. Population and households are sums of the covered ZIP estimates. The income indicator is a population-weighted average of ZIP-level household-income medians, not the state's household median. Census context can refer to a different period from the roster. Housing-unit authorizations refer to the displayed permit year; they are not completed projects. See the ACS estimate guidance and Building Permits Survey for the underlying statistical definitions.
Working one of these markets?
Oregon vs Utah: common questions
Does Oregon or Utah have more contractor records?
Oregon has 32,286 covered records; Utah has 4,281. These counts reflect different source coverage, not a census of operating businesses. Sources: Oregon CCB + Building Codes Division (BCD) and the Utah DOPL Construction Business Registry.
Which has the higher snapshot records-to-population ratio, Oregon or Utah?
Oregon has the higher snapshot ratio: 76.3 snapshot records per 10k residents against 13.0 in Utah.
Which has the higher ZIP-weighted income indicator, Oregon or Utah?
Utah: $90,304 against $80,169 in Oregon. This is a population-weighted average of ZIP-level income medians, not either state's household median.
Where does this Oregon vs Utah comparison data come from?
Roster counts derive from Oregon CCB + Building Codes Division (BCD) and Utah DOPL Construction Business Registry; population, household, income, and permit figures are U.S. Census aggregates. Counts are snapshot records, not a census of unique companies. Source scope and dates differ between states.