Coverage varies by state, trade and authority. These are source snapshots, not a census of unique businesses or a live license check. Ratios cannot establish market saturation or contractor quality.
New York vs Oregon: contractor markets, side by side
New York has 29,413 roster records across the trades we cover; Oregon has 32,286. Counts come from the NYC Department of Buildings + DCWP + City of Buffalo and the Oregon CCB + Building Codes Division (BCD); market figures are U.S. Census aggregates.
| New York | Oregon | |
|---|---|---|
| Covered roster records | 29,413 | 32,286 |
| Snapshot records per 10k residents | 14.7 | 76.3 |
| Residents | 19,994,326 | 4,229,341 |
| Households | 8,494,175 | 1,818,529 |
| ZIP-weighted income indicator | $89,542 | $80,169 |
| Housing units authorized (source year) | 38,667 (2025) | 14,679 (2025) |
| Top covered city by records | Br | Portland |
Oregon has the higher snapshot ratio: 76.3 source records per 10k residents against 14.7 in New York. Differences in source coverage affect this ratio; it does not measure contractors per square mile or competition for jobs.
The ZIP-weighted income indicator is higher in New York: $89,542 against $80,169 in Oregon, using the Census estimates in this dataset. This indicator does not establish renovation budgets or likely sales.
Trade by trade
| Trade | New York | Oregon |
|---|---|---|
| Electricians | 3,539 | 1,191 |
| Plumbers | 1,153 | 1,933 |
| HVAC Contractors | 103 | 458 |
| General Contractors | 24,443 | 30,673 |
| Fire-Protection Contractors | 471 | — |
Counts reflect the separate covered-trade snapshot. A “—” means no count is provided here; it says nothing about whether the trade exists or requires a license. These category counts are not reconciled with the headline roster totals.
Figures use separately generated snapshots: overall roster totals, trade counts and mapped-city counts can differ in scope and collection time and should not be added together or treated as a reconciled census. The displayed source refresh date does not date every aggregate. Population and households are sums of the covered ZIP estimates. The income indicator is a population-weighted average of ZIP-level household-income medians, not the state's household median. Census context can refer to a different period from the roster. Housing-unit authorizations refer to the displayed permit year; they are not completed projects. See the ACS estimate guidance and Building Permits Survey for the underlying statistical definitions.
Working one of these markets?
New York vs Oregon: common questions
Does New York or Oregon have more contractor records?
Oregon has 32,286 covered records; New York has 29,413. These counts reflect different source coverage, not a census of operating businesses. Sources: NYC Department of Buildings + DCWP + City of Buffalo and the Oregon CCB + Building Codes Division (BCD).
Which has the higher snapshot records-to-population ratio, New York or Oregon?
Oregon has the higher snapshot ratio: 76.3 snapshot records per 10k residents against 14.7 in New York.
Which has the higher ZIP-weighted income indicator, New York or Oregon?
New York: $89,542 against $80,169 in Oregon. This is a population-weighted average of ZIP-level income medians, not either state's household median.
Where does this New York vs Oregon comparison data come from?
Roster counts derive from NYC Department of Buildings + DCWP + City of Buffalo and Oregon CCB + Building Codes Division (BCD); population, household, income, and permit figures are U.S. Census aggregates. Counts are snapshot records, not a census of unique companies. Source scope and dates differ between states.