Coverage varies by state, trade and authority. These are source snapshots, not a census of unique businesses or a live license check. Ratios cannot establish market saturation or contractor quality.
Texas vs Utah: contractor markets, side by side
Texas has 9,656 roster records across the trades we cover; Utah has 4,281. Counts come from the Texas Open Data Portal (TDLR) and the Utah DOPL Construction Business Registry; market figures are U.S. Census aggregates.
| Texas | Utah | |
|---|---|---|
| Covered roster records | 9,656 | 4,281 |
| Snapshot records per 10k residents | 3.3 | 13.0 |
| Residents | 29,242,689 | 3,282,203 |
| Households | 11,654,379 | 1,160,621 |
| ZIP-weighted income indicator | $78,473 | $90,304 |
| Housing units authorized (source year) | 210,217 (2025) | 26,775 (2025) |
| Top covered city by records | Houston | Salt Lake City |
Utah has the higher snapshot ratio: 13.0 source records per 10k residents against 3.3 in Texas. Differences in source coverage affect this ratio; it does not measure contractors per square mile or competition for jobs.
The ZIP-weighted income indicator is higher in Utah: $90,304 against $78,473 in Texas, using the Census estimates in this dataset. This indicator does not establish renovation budgets or likely sales.
Trade by trade
| Trade | Texas | Utah |
|---|---|---|
| Electricians | 12,392 | 251 |
| Plumbers | — | 214 |
| HVAC Contractors | — | 440 |
| General Contractors | — | 2,708 |
| Roofing Contractors | — | 142 |
| Solar Contractors | — | 24 |
| Carpenters | — | 584 |
| Concrete Contractors | — | 362 |
| Masons | — | 392 |
| Drywall Contractors | — | 457 |
| Tile Contractors | — | 392 |
| Excavating Contractors | — | 236 |
| Painters | — | 457 |
| Flooring Contractors | — | 584 |
Counts reflect the separate covered-trade snapshot. A “—” means no count is provided here; it says nothing about whether the trade exists or requires a license. These category counts are not reconciled with the headline roster totals.
Figures use separately generated snapshots: overall roster totals, trade counts and mapped-city counts can differ in scope and collection time and should not be added together or treated as a reconciled census. The displayed source refresh date does not date every aggregate. Population and households are sums of the covered ZIP estimates. The income indicator is a population-weighted average of ZIP-level household-income medians, not the state's household median. Census context can refer to a different period from the roster. Housing-unit authorizations refer to the displayed permit year; they are not completed projects. See the ACS estimate guidance and Building Permits Survey for the underlying statistical definitions.
Working one of these markets?
Texas vs Utah: common questions
Does Texas or Utah have more contractor records?
Texas has 9,656 covered records; Utah has 4,281. These counts reflect different source coverage, not a census of operating businesses. Sources: Texas Open Data Portal (TDLR) and the Utah DOPL Construction Business Registry.
Which has the higher snapshot records-to-population ratio, Texas or Utah?
Utah has the higher snapshot ratio: 13.0 snapshot records per 10k residents against 3.3 in Texas.
Which has the higher ZIP-weighted income indicator, Texas or Utah?
Utah: $90,304 against $78,473 in Texas. This is a population-weighted average of ZIP-level income medians, not either state's household median.
Where does this Texas vs Utah comparison data come from?
Roster counts derive from Texas Open Data Portal (TDLR) and Utah DOPL Construction Business Registry; population, household, income, and permit figures are U.S. Census aggregates. Counts are snapshot records, not a census of unique companies. Source scope and dates differ between states.